A fundamental problem with this hypothesis, however, is that the amount of energy released during the accelerated decay proposed by RATE would potentially be enough to evaporate the oceans and melt the Earth's crust (Ross, 2004, 179).The samples RATE tested were from a borehole sample retrieved in 1974 with no statement made as to the storage or collection conditions of the samples.If an object is really a million plus years old as interpreted by Uniformitarian geology then it should not have any Thank you, Talk Origins for proving the point of the claim.
If Earth has existed for billions of years, there should be little helium left in deeper rocks as a result of radioactive alpha decay.
They claim that if God had created the Earth with initial Helium in the atmosphere, the maximum age would be even lower than two million-perhaps even as little as 6,000 years (Humphreys et. The RATE (Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth) project, cosponsored by the Institute for Creation Research, the Creation Research Society, and Answers in Genesis, claims that the amount of helium present in minerals at different depths of the earth's crust is too high to support day-age or evolutionist theories about an old Earth.
However, neither of these questions were answered, and the wording of the paragraph indicates that the samples that were sent to the laboratory were excavated thirty years previous and not fresh. His criticisms range from using faulty standard deviation for error factors to incorrectly identifying rock samples that could lead to very serious errors in measurements to using equations that yield inconsistent dates as examples of how traditional radioisotope dating is flawed.
Even with an obvious lack of sample documentation there is other substantial criticism of the accuracy of the findings of the RATE project. For example, the project's final results were an age of 6,000 ± 2,000 years; the standard deviation should have been 6,000 ± 4,600 years (Henke, 2005).
They sent rock samples to a lab for helium diffusion tests, and their results were that the rock samples have too little resistance to the diffusion of Helium through the rock for the age to be greater than at most two million years.
The conclusion reached by the RATE project as to the reason for the increased amount of Helium is that sometime in the past few thousand years there was a period of increased radioactivity (De Young, 2005, 78).
Reprinted in Creation Research Society Quarterly 19(2): 117-127 (1982). Origins quotes in blue) This rebuttal is problematic before Talk.
An object interpreted as too old for radiocarbon dating by Uniformitarian geology may not be interpreted as too old for radiocarbon dating by Flood geology.
On the other hand, it would be misuse, under the creationist system, to attempt to get accurate dates of objects believed to be over say 3000 years old, whereas uniformitarian assumptions would not preclude that.Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating