Redating the great sphinx of giza schoch Free sex finder with no login and no credits

Temple’s command of the Sphinx literature is deficient, and the book is not properly and adequately referenced. On page 299, Temple includes a reproduction of an illustration of the sarcophagus of Seti I, which he tells us in the caption “was published in 1837 in a periodical of the time,” but he never provides the name of the periodical or full reference. Temple cites John Anthony West, Graham Hancock, and Robert Bauval as the “popular writers who have cam­paigned for the idea that the Sphinx is of immense antiquity” (p. Temple recounts the gist of the argument: the Sphinx area shows “water erosion,” Egypt is known today for its desert environment, heavy rainfall occurred in Egypt in earlier times, therefore the Sphinx must date back to those earlier times (“about 10,000 BC” is the date Temple at­tributes to West, Hancock, and Bauval). 243) states his own position as such, “I was never convinced by this argument from the very beginning for the simple reason that there is just no archaeological record at all for any important civilization during approxi­mately seven thousand years of the time postulated between the ‘ancient rain’ and the apparent beginnings of high civilization in Egypt.” Temple’s argument might have carried some weight twenty years ago, but, as I pointed out in a previous article ( #76), we now have the amazing megalithic site of Göbekli Tepe in Turkey, just north of the Syrian border (admittedly not in Egypt, but certainly close enough geographically to pertain to the argument).

Conventional Egyptological thinking dates the Sphinx to 2500 BC, during the Fourth Dynasty of the Old Kingdom.

My dating plac­es its oriågins long before the rise of dynastic Egypt, back to a time when, according to the traditional paradigm, high culture and civilization did not exist.

Additionally, the banner image at the top of this page shows this plasma strike in greater detail.

Not long ago I was asked by Boston University to give a master class of my research to a select group of its alumni.

During the summer of 2016, while leading a tour of Egypt, two friends and colleagues, Yousef Awyan and Mohamed Ibraham, showed me a feature on the Giza Plateau that they suspected would catch my attention.

Indeed, it did: a potential ancient lightning strike right in front of the immense Second Pyramid.

Before moving on, however, I would note that although the volume may seem impressive at first glance, chock full of rare photographs, diagrams, reprinted illustrations, and lengthy quotes from the literature, de­tailed scrutiny points up a number of faults.

The reproduction of the photographs and diagrams is of substandard quality; it is difficult or impossible to see de­tails (for instance, contour labels on some of the maps are unreadable).

This could conceivably have been done with some sort of mortar, cement, brick, or tile combination, but there is no evidence that this was the case.

Tags: , ,